Project RAG is the only VA-specific legal research tool built for VA disability attorneys. Search CAVC, CAFC, OGC, and 38 CFR opinions in plain English. Every result cites a real case you can file tomorrow.
Every other tool in this space helps you understand your client's file.
We help you win the legal argument.
The system never generates, it only retrieves. If a case isn't in the archive, the response is silence, not fiction.
Type a legal concept, regulatory citation, or case name. No training required, plain language works.
The system searches hundreds of thousands of actual relevant source documents, returning only results above a strict relevance threshold.
Case name. Docket number. Decision date. Judge. Holding summary. Exact verbatim passage. Every result is traceable to a primary source you can cite in court.
Each database is a separate research engine with its own corpus and system prompt. You always know exactly what source you're searching.
The primary appellate court for all VA benefit denials. CAVC opinions define the legal standards VA must follow: nexus, duty to assist, rating reductions, CUE, effective dates, and more.
The federal appellate court directly above CAVC. CAFC opinions are binding on CAVC. When the Federal Circuit speaks on veterans law, every CAVC judge must follow it.
The VA's own general counsel's binding legal interpretations. Argue that the VA is violating its own legal rulings, an extremely powerful position no competing tool currently supports.
The complete regulatory rulebook VA adjudicators must follow: every rating schedule, eligibility rule, and procedural requirement. Attorneys cite it constantly.
Internal VA training documents that reveal how VA actually applies the rules, exposing the gap between what the law says and how claims are processed.
Full-text BVA decisions from the Board of Veterans' Appeals. Searchable by issue, condition, and legal theory. Reveals how individual Veterans Service Centers are actually deciding claims on the ground.
Every design decision was made to answer one question: can you stand behind this output in front of a judge?
The system cannot invent a case. It retrieves passages from a fixed, auditable document archive. No response is generated without a source document. If the archive returns zero results, that is the answer.
Each result returns the case name, docket number, decision date, judge, and the exact verbatim passage from the original document. Verify any result against the primary source directly. No paraphrasing. No synthesis.
A relevance score threshold is enforced before any result is returned. Results below that threshold are rejected. Medium-confidence results are flagged as addressing a related but not identical issue. The system does not improvise.
Manually searching scattered databases. Pulling CAVC opinions one by one. Hunting OGC precedents across disconnected sources. Hours of work before you even start writing.
Type the issue. Get the relevant cases, regulations, and opinions instantly. Every result includes the exact passage you can cite. Works alongside whatever else is in your stack.
Competitors typically charge $200–$600 per user per month for general legal research. Project RAG is VA-specific and built for the exact citations you need. Founding firm rates are locked permanently before public launch.
Card required. No charge for 48 hours. Founding rate locked permanently once subscribed. Cancel anytime, self-serve from your account — no calls, no emails.
Join now to lock in $799/mo permanently.
Founding firms lock their rate permanently. Pricing goes up when we open to the public.
No commitment. No sales pitch. Just the tool, live, on your questions.
Founding firm rate locked permanently for all firms that join before public launch.